Recalled: 5,760 Cases Of Capri Sun Wild Cherry Flavored Juice Drink
Before you pack your kids’ lunches or send them out to play with a juice drink pack, be sure any Capri Sun products you’re distributing aren’t among the 5,760 cases of cherry flavored juice drink blend recalled by Kraft Heinz.
Only the Capri Sun Wild Cherry flavored juice drink blend beverages with a June 25, 2023, “Best When Used By “date on them were affected.
According to recall release from Kraft Heinz and the FDA, several consumer complaints about the taste of the product lead to discovery that diluted cleaning solution used on food processing equipment was inadvertently introduced into a production line at one of the company’s factories.
“The Company is actively working with retail partners and distributors to remove potentially impacted product from circulation,” according to the recall notice.
Consumers who purchased these items should not consume the product and can return it to the store where it was purchased. Consumers can contact Kraft Heinz from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, Monday through Friday, at 1-800-280-8252 to see if a product is part of the recall and to receive reimbursement.
| Size | Product Name | Packaging Description | Code On Pouch | Code on Carton | Carton UPC | Case UPC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.6 FL OZ | Capri Sun Wild Cherry Flavored Juice Drink Blend | Individual foil pouches packed in paperboard cartons. (Note: Cases shipped to retailers include 4 cartons that are shrink-wrapped together. Product is sold by the carton at retail.) | 25JUN2023 WXX LYY #### (Note: #### would be between 0733-0900 for product affected by this issue. XX may be 01, 02, 03, 04, 09, or 10. YY may be 01 through 12. | 25JUN2023 WXX #### CT1404. (Note: #### would be between 0733-1000 for product affected by this issue. XX may be 01, 02, or 03.) | 0 8768400100 4 | 87684 00409 00 |
Minor Changes To SSISD Policy Should Make Qualifying For Extended Leave A Little Easier
Minor changes to two local policies should make qualifying for extended leave a little easier, should employees have cause to need it, Sulphur Springs ISD administrators told trustees when presenting the recommended changes for approval this week.
SSISD Assistant Superintendent Lisa Robinson noted Aug. 15, 2022, that DMA and DEC were the two local policies administrators had pulled out of the Texas Association of School Boards Policy Services Localized Policy Manual Update 119, which trustees approved at their regular Aug. 8 meeting, for further review before submitting them for approval.
DEC (Local)
SSISD Superintendent Michael Lamb noted DEC(Local) consists of two parts which and asked them to approve changes to two words.
“There’s two different parts in one policy that we think we can make some changes to that will relieve some pressure on our employees, if a COVID situation were to come back, if sub situations were come back. This is just our effort to hear from them and reach out and help,” Lamb said, noting he’d sent the trustees some data for the items being recommended.
Lamb said administrators frequently are told SSISD is the only school they know of that charges for a sub in a leave policy. A survey of 30 schools showed that to be true; none of those reviewed charge for a substitute.
“We would like to change that from saying yes to us charging for a sub to a no, which would put us in line with every other school we were able to look up,” Lamb said.
Trustees agreed to remove “the average daily rate of pay of a substitute for the employee’s position shall be deducted for each day of local leave taken, whether or not a substitute is employed” from DEC local.
The second recommended change to DEC (Local) had to do with extended leave. He said a survey of other school showed varied policies.
“The way our works is for up to 30 days you can, under special circumstances, you can get some leave, but you have to have been absent five times before that. We felt like it caused people if they were going to be three, they went ahead and stayed home two more just to qualify. So we’d like to change that from five to three days just to ease that up a little bit, make it a little more user friendly,” Lamb said.
Of the schools surveyed, some give 30 days, some 20, others 15, 10. A few schools have no limit at all. Half of the schools surveyed don’t offer it at all, but do have a sick bank or sick pool. SSISD has talked about the possibility of a sick pool but has not had one. Having a sick bank or pool would require a committee to decide what is and is not worthy, which would make it more difficult to keep things fair and more equal among employees.
“So, just to have some clarity, switching for 5 to 3 days, allows them to access 30 days extended leave?” SSISD Trustee Jason Dietze asked.
Lamb affirmed, this would allow the employee to become eligible for extended leave under extenuating circumstances two days sooner.
“It would have to be FMLA qualified then we do deduct sub rate for those 30 days, but they don’t have to have five first,” SSISD Business Manager Sherry McGraw clarified.
“But the school district tracks the FMLA; it’s 12 weeks annually?” Trustee John Prickette asked.
McGraw affirmed they would send a packet to the employee to get needed information for FMLA.
DMA (Local)
Robinson noted that the recommended update for DMA (Local) policy removed any reference to the existing exchange time policy.
“We realized that what’s now in here with the new recommended wording for DMA (Local) for our professional development policy needed to have some old wording still cleaned out of it that pertained to exchange time and practices that we no longer use because we’ve imbedded our professional development during the contract year for our teachers,” Robinson explained. “This policy now is very cleaned up; it’s very short. The way that it’s recommended for now according to what called for in Senate Bill 1267 is that once this is approved, we will annually present to you our professional development plan for the district. All of the details of our plan won’t exist in the policy, it will exist in the plan that accompanies that.”
Robinson said with board approval on Aug. 18, administrators will draft using “clearinghouse recommendations” a schedule of the professional development that are being done this year, which will be presented to the trustees at the next regular school board meeting.
Additional Policy Updates
The school trustees approved both policy changes a recommended, on Aug. 15, 2022. The trustees also approved on Aug. 8 as presented Policy Update 119, which included 51 legal policies and 8 legal policies, minus DEC and DMA local. Josh Williams, who was transitioning from Assistant Superintendent back to the high school to serve as campus principal, presented the policies for board review and gave a brief overview of notable changes in July.
Other Action Items
Trustees also at the special Aug. 15 board meeting opted to renew the district’s contract with TPS for property/casualty insurance for 2022-2023, even with a 25% increase in premium. McGraw noted the district has been with Offenhauser for 21 years, but has had different carriers. The current is TPS, and it was TAPS before that. She said it might be worth going out for bids next year.
She said that seemed high to her too, so she had TPS representatives stop by explain the big jump in cost. Essentially, she learned that the increase is due to some big claims over the last 5 years, which is what the rate is based on. This factors in the 2018-2019 hail damage claims to repair roofs, which is projected to be $2 million more as a recent survey of district facilities revealed one elementary campus that had damages. The amount is added to year of damage, not year it’s reported. The rate also factors in damages from the ice storm 2 years ago, which totaled about $643,000.
An increase in property values also helped drive the insurance premium up as the replacement value insurance would have to pay rose from about $159 million to about $172 million. That 8.3% increase in property values drove the rate up 18%, and the $2 million in additional claims drove it up even more.
If SSISD can keep claims low for three consecutive years, some of these claims will roll off, which in turn should drop the premium rate some,
She said one other option to consider for property/casualty insurance is TASB, the largest to offer the service. However, that also requires the district to also transfer their workers comp fund to them as well. TPS is the second largest group to offer the service.
Personnel
SSISD school board at the Aug. 15 meeting also approved as recommended by administrators one resignation and three new hires.
Janelle Safford is the new director of instructional technology. Jada Goodson and Denise Luna were hired as special education aides; Goodson will work at Middle School and Luna at Sulphur Springs Elementary.
Christine Rogers’ resignation as a fourth grade special education teacher at SSES was also accepted by trustees at the special 4 p.m. board meeting on Aug. 15, 2022.
Creative Arts Contest Features Works Of Multi-Talented Hopkins County Residents
By Johanna Hicks, B.S., M.Ed., Texas A&M AgriLife Extension, Hopkins County Family & Community Health Agent, [email protected]
The Hopkins County Fall Festival Creative Arts Contest is one of the premier events of the annual Fall Festival. With multi-talented individuals who enter one or more items to be judged, combined with a large group of volunteers to staff the event, and topped off with highly qualified trained individuals to judge the entries, the Creative Arts contest is a sight to behold!
As a word of explanation, this is a totally separate event from the Arts & Crafts Show (more on that later). This is a contest, similar to the State Fair of Texas Creative Arts contest (but on a slightly smaller scale). The contest will take place in the Sulphur Springs High School Conference Center, October 20-22, 2022. Due to space limitations, entrants must be from Hopkins County, but anyone is welcome to visit the event during public viewing. Professional exhibits will not be allowed (example: professional photos, professional floral arrangements, etc.) Below are some additional guidelines:
- Articles must have been made within the past year (September, 2021 through October, 2022.)
- Items may be entered at the high school Conference Center Thursday, October 20 between 4:30 and 6 p.m., or Friday, October 21 between 7:30 and 9:30 a.m. No entries will be accepted after that time unless approved by the registration committee. If these times are not possible for the individual, items may be taken to the Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Office Monday, 1200 West Houston, Sulphur Springs, October 17 through Wednesday, October 19, 8:30 to 4:30 p.m.
- Age divisions are: Children (ages 10 and under); Youth (ages 11-19); Adults (ages 20-69); and Mature Adults (ages 70 and up). We also have an assisted living and nursing home division.
- Entries must use labels provided at registration.
- Judging of entries will take place on Friday, October 21, beginning at 10 a.m. Each entry will be awarded a ribbon based on merit. Best of Show and Reserve Best of Show will be selected from blue ribbon winners in each division.
- Items will be on display to the public following judging on Friday, October 21 until 5 p.m. and on Saturday, October 22 from 9 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. Check-out begins at 1:30 p.m. Items should be picked up by 2:30 p.m.
- Best of Show and Reserve Best of Show recipient pictures will be taken at 1:30 p.m. in the Conference Center on Saturday, October 22. Winners will not be contacted, so please check your entries for ribbons and make plans to be there!
- The Creative Arts Committee is not responsible for any damage that may occur during public viewing times. However, volunteer staff will be on hand at all times to keep watch on the exhibits.
Entry categories are: Art, Baked Goods, Clothing Construction, Creative Crafts, Decorated Crafts, Food Preservation, Handiwork, Holiday-Seasonal, Horticulture, Photography, Quilts, and Woodworking. There are several classes for each category, and individuals may enter as many classes as desired.
Entry fee is only $1 per adult to help defray expenses. Children and students will not be charged. Contact my office at 903-885-3443 for a full list of categories and make plans to enter the 2022 Creative Arts Contest!
Closing Thought
Not all of us can do great things, but we can all do small things with great love.
– Mother Teresa
Contact Johanna Hicks, Texas A&M AgriLife Extension for Family & Community Health Agent, at the Hopkins County Extension Office, P.O. Box 518, 1200-B West Houston, Sulphur Springs, TX 75483; 903-885-3443; or [email protected].
Aug. 17, 2022 Chamber Connection – 70 Entries Already Registered For Stew Contest
Ribeye Roundup Entry Deadline Is Sept. 1; This Year’s Event Features Junior Cook Category For Ages 7-17 Years
By Butch Burney, Hopkins County Chamber of Commerce President/CEO,
Registration for the 53rd Annual Hopkins County Stew Festival, presented by Alliance Bank, have been pouring in. We already have almost 70 entries with more than a month to go before the deadline.
To register, go online to the Chamber’s website at HopkinsChamber.org/stewcooks, email [email protected] or call 903-885-6515. The cost to enter is $100 per stew pot, with $150 coming from the sponsor to pay for ingredients.
Register now to reserve your spot from last year.
This year, stew cooks can also pre-order a T-shirt with “Stew Cook” on the back for $15.
We also are taking applications for our vendor market at the stew. Cost is $75 for Chamber members, $100 for nonmembers. Go to our website at HopkinsChamber.org or call Amanda at 903-885-6515 to register.
We still have a few sponsorship opportunities available as well.
Photography Contest
It’s time once again for the Chamber of Commerce’s annual photography contest!
The photography contest is open to anyone who resides in Hopkins County. We have seven categories: Natural World, Travel, Family and People, The Hopkins County Experience, Altered Images, Mobile, and Children (for photographers up to 18 years of age).
Photographs must have been taken in Hopkins County no earlier than Jan. 1, 2021.
See the rules on our website, HopkinsChamber.org. You can also upload your photos to our website to enter. The deadline to enter is Aug. 31.
Ribeye Roundup
If you’re looking for a great steak, you don’t want to miss the Cattleman’s Classic and Ribeye Roundup on Saturday, Oct. 1, on the downtown plaza.
The event features a steak cook-off which will include an expected 40-plus cook teams, educational trade show, free Bobby Irwin concert and more.
Cooks have until Sept. 1 to get their entry forms in, and this year there will be a junior cook classification for youth ages 7-17. Go to the Facebook page to learn more.
You can also get a blue Ribeye Roundup T-shirt for just $14 at the Chamber of Commerce, 110 Main St. Come by to pick one up!
Guest Brunch
The Hopkins County Historical Society will host free brunch on Saturday, Aug. 20, at the Winniford Building in Heritage Park, beginning at 10 a.m., with special guests Carol Burnett (Enola Gay) emceeing, along with portrayals of Roy Rogers and Dale Evans, Minnie Pearl, Rosie the Riveter, Jane Austen, Loretta Lynn, Dollie Parton, Mary Poppins and Raggedy Ann.
Donations will be accepted.
Quilt Show
The 21st Annual Quilt Show, presented by the Lone Star Heritage Quilt Guild, is set for Sept. 23-24 at First Baptist Church’s The ROC. Admission is $5 per person (under 12 are free). It will last from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Friday and 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. Saturday.
Lisa Erlandson, AQS certified appraiser of Quilted Textiles and historian, will be the special speaker. There will be more than 100 quilts along with door prizes and vendors. For more information, go to SulphurSpringsTxQuilts.com.
Ribbon Cutting
Hopkins County Abstract will host a ribbon cutting at noon on Tuesday, Aug. 23, at their office at 441 Oak Ave. Please join us for this event.
August 22 Jury Panel Canceled
The jury panel summoned to appear at 1 p.m. August 22, 2022, for County Court of Law with Judge Clay Harrison has been canceled. Those summoned for jury service do not need to report for duty that day.
County Judge Presented Petition Asking For Election To Make Dike A Type C Incorporated City
The county judge was presented with a petition Monday asking him to call an election to let Dike residents determine whether to make the community at Type C incorporated city, as promised in prior meetings by Michael Pickens. Other Dike residents voiced their views on incorporation of Dike and the Dike solar facility.
Petition to Incorporate Dike
Residents and property owners in Dike community began researching the matter out of a desire to control what goes on in their community after they learned the Commissioners Court had approved tax incentives for a solar project planned in the Dike community.
When speaking up in Commissioners Court and a community meeting hosted by Engie and Hopkins County failed to achieve the goal of residents seeking to stop the solar project from coming to Dike, an attempt to get an injunction and other legal action also was sought. The Dike residents opposed to the solar company leasing private land and installing a solar facility in their community organized.
Initially, the Dike residents voices a hope to incorporate before construction of the solar project began, but were not able to do so. Michael Pickens, spokesperson for Save Dike from Solar, advised the Commissioners Court and County Judge in previous meetings recently that the residents in opposition to the solar facility were working on the requirements to make Dike an incorporate area, so that Dike residents have a say in decision-making that impacts their community.
During Monday’s Commissioners Court meeting, Kirk Reams read a letter drafted to Hopkins County Judge Robert Newsom, asking him to order an incorporation election, and appoint two election judges, and publish or post notice of the election as required, in accordance with Chapter 8 of Texas Government Code Chapter. He then presented the letter, along with a signed petition, and a map of the proposed area of Dike to be incorporated to the county judge.
Reams noted Dike community was settled in 1850 and initially named Booneville. The first US Post Office was established in 1890, with the first postmaster sworn in by President Benjamin Harrison. The community name was changed from Booneville to Dike after residents discovered another town in Texas already existed. A public school operated in Dike in 1905. Dike had six general stores, a blacksmith and two physicians by 1914. In 1985, Dike had three churches, a US Post Office, a camp and 170 residents.
Currently, Reams reports, Dike’s population falls between the requisite 201 inhabitants but less than 5,000. The map of incorporation charts 1.72 square miles, within which more than 201 but less than 2,000 inhabitants. He noted the petition presented to Newsom during the special 11 a.m. Commissioners Court session Monday, Aug. 15, 2022, contained signatures from more than the requisite 10% of qualified voters in Dike community, who reside within the incorporated area.
Reams then requested that the county judge order an incorporation election to be held as soon as legally practicable for Dike, which meets the requirements for a Type C City under the general laws of Texas. The request asks the judge to set a specific date and designate a place in the community for the election, then designate two election judges, one of whom would serve as presiding election judge. The letter petitioning for the incorporation election also asks that three names be added to the ballot for election to mayor and commissioners of Dike: Kirk Reams as mayor, and Betty Waters and Lucretia Pool as commissioners. The elected mayor and commissioners would serve until the first regular election for municipal officers could be held.
“At this time I’m going to present you with the papers that you need to incorporate Dike. This is a map of where the incorporation will be. Also, a map’s in here,” Reams said, and upon obtaining permission from Newsom handed the documents to him.
“It’s a good day for Dike, Texas. We are excited that we can uphold our community, and keep this trash solar out of our community. I don’t know what it is about you guys. You just won’t step back and look at what our point of view is. All y’all see is the money, that’s all you see,” Reams accused with a shake of his head.
He then asked Precinct 3 Commissioner Wade Bartley, if the money was budgeted, why the road he asked him three weeks ago to fix hasn’t been repaired, before retiring to his seat.
When presented with petitions such as the incorporation election, officially typically go through the process of making sure the document meets all terms as specified, then, take whatever steps legally follow.
Additional Related Comments
While several outspoken residents have addressed the court on various occasions regarding the planned solar facility and incorporation, not all Dike residents are opposed to the solar project nor are all in favor of incorporation.
Dike resident Michael Russell has lived in the area most of his life, and has served his country and community, first in the Marine Corps and for the last 10 years at Hopkins County Sheriff’s Office, working his way up from deputy to investigator. He made clear where he stands on the matter of incorporation of Dike.
“I do not agree with incorporating Dike. Nobody can enforce the laws without law enforcement out there. The sheriff’s office cannot go out there and enforce laws that are imposed by the city,” Russell said.
He said while some people are for it, he is completely against incorporating Dike. He also said he was never contacted by anyone about incorporation or to sign the petition presented to the judge Monday morning.
Russell also added that while some “want to dog Mr. Bartley” he thinks he and the Commissioners Court do a good job. He said he realizes there’s more to their jobs than maintaining roads, and understands that.
Dike resident resident Larry Argenbright, a retired Hopkins County Constable, noted that he and his family have been residents of Hopkins County for a long time. His family first settled in the area in the 1870s. His great-great-grandfather is buried in a cemetery in a pasture not far from his home. He was born in the clinic on the square.
“I’ve been here a while and I’m telling you this,” Argenbright said of the solar facility, “will destroy our community.”
Argenbright cited a decrease in property values and noise from inverters, of which he’s been told there will be 60-70, which make 85 decibels of noise. That noise, he said, will make Dike sound like it has a superhighway running through it.
“All I wanted to do when I retired, and I’ve met with this court many, many times, all I wanted to do is get over there and live, be left alone. Now, I’ve got health problems, probably because of y’all,” Argenbright said, addressing the Commissioners Court, “and had to have a pacemaker put in. All I want to do is live and be left alone, that’s all I’m asking: just leave me alone, please.”
FDA Finalizes Rule Improving Access To OTC Hearing Aids
More Affordable Hearing Aids For Those With Mild To Moderate Hearing Impairment Could Be In Stores As Soon As Mid-October
Today (Aug. 16, 2022), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a final rule to improve access to hearing aids which may in turn lower costs for millions of Americans. This action establishes a new category of over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids, enabling consumers with perceived mild to moderate hearing impairment to purchase hearing aids directly from stores or online retailers without the need for a medical exam, prescription or a fitting adjustment by an audiologist.
The rule is expected to lower the cost of hearings aids, furthering the Biden-Harris Administration’s goal of expanding access to high-quality health care and lowering health care costs for the American public. It is designed to assure the safety and effectiveness of OTC hearing aids, while fostering innovation and competition in the hearing aid technology marketplace.
Today’s action follows President Biden’s Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy, which called for the FDA to take steps to allow hearing aids to be sold over the counter and set a swift 120-day deadline for action, which the FDA met. In 2017, Congress passed bipartisan legislation requiring the FDA to create a category of OTC hearing aids, but it was not fully implemented until now. Consumers could see OTC hearing aids available in traditional retail and drug stores as soon as mid-October when the rule takes effect.
“Reducing health care costs in America has been a priority of mine since Day One and this rule is expected to help us achieve quality, affordable health care access for millions of Americans in need,” said Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra. “Today’s action by the FDA represents a significant milestone in making hearing aids more cost-effective and accessible.”
Close to 30 million adults in the U.S. could benefit from hearing aid use. Individuals with permanent hearing impairment can use hearing aids to help make speech and sounds louder, improving the ability to communicate effectively with others. Many hearing aids can be expensive. The final rule aims to stimulate competition and facilitate the sale of safe and effective OTC hearing aids in traditional retail stores or online nationwide, providing consumers with perceived mild to moderate hearing loss with improved access to devices that meet their needs and are less expensive than current options.
“Hearing loss is a critical public health issue that affects the ability of millions of Americans to effectively communicate in their daily social interactions,” said FDA Commissioner Robert M. Califf, M.D. “Establishing this new regulatory category will allow people with perceived mild to moderate hearing loss to have convenient access to an array of safe, effective and affordable hearing aids from their neighborhood store or online.”
The OTC category established in this final rule applies to certain air-conduction hearing aids intended for people 18 years of age and older who have perceived mild to moderate hearing impairment. Hearing aids that do not meet the requirements for the OTC category (for example, because they are intended for severe hearing impairment or users younger than age 18) are prescription devices.
The FDA finalized the rule after receiving and reviewing more than 1,000 public comments on the proposed rule issued on Oct. 20, 2021. Comments submitted by consumers, professional associations, hearing aid manufacturers, public health organizations and advocacy groups, members of Congress, state agencies, and other stakeholders are summarized in the final rule, along with the FDA’s respective responses. In response to public comments and to assure the safety and effectiveness of OTC hearing aids, the final rule incorporates several changes from the proposed rule, including lowering the maximum sound output to reduce the risk to hearing from over-amplification of sound, revising the insertion depth limit in the ear canal, requiring that all OTC hearing aids have a user-adjustable volume control, and simplifying the phrasing throughout the required device labeling to ensure it is easily understood. The final rule also includes performance specifications and device design requirements specific to OTC hearing aids.
Furthermore, today’s action correspondingly amends existing rules that apply to prescription hearing aids for consistency with the new OTC category, it repeals the conditions for sale for hearing aids, and it includes provisions that address some of the effects of the FDA OTC hearing aid regulations on state regulation of hearing aids.
Concurrently with issuing the final rule, the FDA also issued the final guidance, Regulatory Requirements for Hearing Aid Devices and Personal Sound Amplification Products (PSAPs), to clarify the differences between hearing aids, which are medical devices, and PSAPs, consumer products that help people with normal hearing amplify sounds.
The effective date for the final rule is 60 days following publication in the Federal Register. Manufacturers of hearing aids sold prior to the effective date of the final rule will have 240 days after its publication to comply with the new or revised requirements. For hearing aids that have not been offered for sale prior to the effective date, compliance with the new or revised requirements must be achieved before marketing the device, including obtaining 510(k) clearance if applicable.
Related Information
HCSO: Sulphur Springs Man Caught Hauling A Stolen Trailer
A 36-year-old Sulphur Springs man was caught hauling with a stolen trailer Monday evening, according to arrest reports.
Hopkins County Sheriff’s deputies were made aware from a person they considered a credible source that the man was in possession of a stolen trailer, as well as a possible location, deputies wrote in arrest reports.
The sheriff’s officers reported seeing a white Chevrolet pickup pulling a trailer matching the description given by the source south on FM 69 north at the south service road. The trailer, deputies noted in arrest reports, did not have proper trailer registration tags so a traffic stop was initiated at 6:46 p.m. Aug. 15, 2022.
Once stopped, the deputies contacted the man driving the pickup. He claimed to be unsure who the trailer belonged to; he’d just picked it up he’d been instructed to do by his uncle, deputies alleged in arrest reports.
Deputies took the Sulphur Springs man into custody at 7:09 p.m. and transported him to Hopkins County jail, where he was booked in for theft of property, the trailer he was hauling that officials were told had been stolen, according to arrest reports.
The 36-year-old was released from the county Tuesday, Aug. 16, 2022, on a $1,000 bond for a misdemeanor theft of property valued at $750 or more but less than $2,500 charge, according to Hopkins County jail records.
KSST does not publish the names or photos of people charged with misdemeanor crimes in staff-generated reports, only those accused of felony offenses.
The Hopkins County Sheriff’s Office is located at 298 Rosemont St., Sulphur Springs, TX 75482.
Non-emergency calls can be made to (903) 438-4040.
Students Register for Fall Classes at Paris Junior College
CHECKING
Returning student Addyson Lamb, left, of Sulphur Springs is checking her schedule with PJC-Sulphur Springs Center Office Manager Dana Smock. Registration for fall classes is continuing during August. Fall 1 eight-week and Fall 16-week classes begin on August 29.
Paris Junior College — located in Paris, Texas, about 100 miles northeast of Dallas — has been a part of the Lamar County community since 1924.
Paris Junior College offers Associate in Arts, Associate in Science and Associate in Applied Science degrees, as well as Certificates of Proficiency in technical/workforce fields. The college has expanded its academic curriculum through the years to encourage associate degree and university transfer candidates. Since establishing its first vocational program — jewelry and watchmaking in 1942 — the college has been aggressive in adding technical/workforce programs that will benefit students entering the workforce.
The campus of 54 tree-shaded acres includes 20 major buildings and residence halls and provides students a unique and pleasant environment for learning.
Paris Junior College also operates centers in Sulphur Springs, Texas, and in Greenville, Texas.
Vision
To be the educational provider of choice for the region.
Mission
Paris Junior College is a comprehensive community college serving the region’s educational and training needs while strengthening the economic, social and cultural life of our diverse community.
Request For Special Use Permit For Manufactured Home Community Withdrawn
A request made for a special use permit to allow C&C Guardian LLC to construct a manufactured home community at 2113 Main Street, a property currently zoned light commercial, was slated to go before Sulphur Springs Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals Tuesday evening, but that meeting has been canceled. Applicant Ross Cody has withdrawn the request, according to city staff.
The action follows a Planning & Zoning Commission meeting in which several residents and business representatives voiced concerns about his proposed manufactured home community at that location on Main Street. Overall, approximately 2 dozen nearby residents and business representatives attended the Aug. 15 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting, which concluded with the P&Z Commission not recommending the Zoning Board approve the special permit request.
Project Concept
Ross Cody, who was born and raised in Sulphur Springs, where his family members have been entrepreneurs throughout the county. He and his wife were recently able to move back home to Sulphur Springs recently. He’s done several things in the past, including working in insurance and equipment businesses, but wasn’t sure where he wanted life to take him career-wise. He has been working at Clayton Homes for about 6 months.
“Working at Clayton Homes, the things that makes the difference is getting to help families, families that can only afford $200,000 and that’s the max they’ve got for their family. They’ve got their warehouse workers here in the community trying to provide for their families. I would love for everybody to be able to afford a $400,000 stately home, but right the economy is not easy for everybody to do that,” Cody said.
Cody saw an opportunity to offer some affordable housing by constructing a manufactured home community not far from Clayton Homes on Main Street. Initially, he proposed placing 30 homes on the 10-acres, containing a 40 x 100 foot single-wide lots and middle lots 0.2-acre and northern lots containing 0.23-acre site. Single-wide units would be 16 x 76 feet and double-wide units would be 28 x 60 feet. The park would contain 2 ponds.
He then over the weekend thought on the matter, acknowledging the stigma often attached to manufactured homes: people don’t think they hold up well, that they are a trashy community, possible criminal activity. That’s not what he wants for his development.
“My purpose was to figure out an option for people in this community to buy a new or 1-year-old homes, Clayton Home-built to put in this community,” Cody said.
So, he revised his concept plan, reducing the number of units to 18 multi-section units only, at least 1,500 square-foot but up to 2,000 square-feet, with 3-bedrooms and two baths, valued at $180,000-$200,000. The lots, as proposed in the concept submitted to the city (without engineering), would be 110 x 110 feet, which was be a little over 0.22-acre, the exact same size as in Stone Briar estates, Cody pointed out.
That, he said, would allow people who work in factories to afford housing in town, eliminating the need to live outside the city limits and drive 10 minutes or more to work, Cody pointed out. The community would have two ponds as amenities, where families could fish.
“Thank you all for coming out. It was never my intentions to have a rundown community,” Cody said. “It’s going to be something that was presentable. There’s obviously conditions and restrictions that would go with it.”
Planning & Zoning Commission member Craig English asked Cody if his plan calls the house to already be there, and people would simply buy the land and lot or buy the lot then the house.
“How I want to set it up, is I want to help each family individually. I don’t want to send 10 out there and it be a lease or rent. I want it to be a family that is approved to get a traditional mortgage just like everybody else is in the city. They can get a traditional mortgage, a 25-30-year mortgage, and they buy the land and they put the home on the land,” Cody said.
He was asked who would be responsible for maintaining common areas, such as the two ponds and driveway/road through the community. Cody said it is not his intent to have it set up as a traditional mobile home park, not any currently in the city.
Assistant City Manager/Community Development Director Tory Niewiadomski pointed out that if the lots are subdivided, the city would be responsible for maintaining the road through it, but if it’s constructed as a typical mobile home park, that would make the road a private driveway and road, which the city would not be responsible for maintaining.
Cody said he’d planned to start with gravel street until the development is filled then finish it out in either asphalt or concrete. He said he’d be willing to form an home owners association or whatever is necessary to ensure the homes and community is maintained and common areas kept up, and all restrictions and conditions are met. He presented a page with a proposed list of restrictions residents would need to follow. Each owner would be responsible for their lot, but the rest would be up to the owner of the community.
Minimum requirements established by the City of Sulphur Springs for trailer parks include enclosing the park on both side lines as well as the rear of the property, with a fence at least 5 feet tall. The front has to be enclosed, with ornamental fencing or masonry. Each trailer space has to be at least 34-feet along the front space line and a minimum depth of 50-feet. All streets, pads and parking are required to be paved or concreted. Streets within the park must be a minimum of 25 feet, and trailer wheels shall not be removed. Trailer setback would need to be 5-feet from towing connection, 2 feet of side yard and 5 feet or rear yard setback. Niewiadomski pointed out.
Concerns Expressed
The city officials noted that notices had been sent out to surrounding properties regarding the special use permit request from C&C Guardian, LLC, for the manufactured home community concept at 2113 Main St. The city received feedback from 12 in opposition to the proposed manufactured home community, including four from Koby Circle in Stonebriar subdivision. Some of the voiced statements were that the residents moved to that neighborhood to get away from these types of developments.
Concerns too included the quality of housing and how it would negatively impact adjacent property values; the strain it could have on city services, potential crime, safety and security, the assistant city manager pointed out.
There are already four mobile home parks in the city limits: Lakeview, which has 54 units; Parkins, 14 or more units; Galaxy, southeast of the proposed Main Street development, 43 units; and Hillcrest, located south of Galaxy, with 54 units. There’s also Travel Time RV, located along I-30, west of the Hillcrest mobile home park. If approved, the proposed manufactured home community would have be the third along Main Street, Neiwiadomski noted.
With four new neighborhoods being built — Ellis Crossing, a 160-unit subdivision under development on State Highway 11 west; 1,150 units development on the west side of Stonebriar, north of the railroad tracks; 14 additional units in Woodbridge Crossing; and The Reserve at Sulphur Springs, a 72-unit senior adult apartment complex on League Street — those submitting feedback feel there are other housing options for families in the Sulphur Springs community, Niewiadomski told the P&Z Commission.
Nine people signed a letter of feedback to the city that also noted there potential safety hazard of having complex at a location accessible only from Main Street, a narrow street with no turn lane and traffic congestion during peak work hours at nearby businesses and residents, as well as a blind curve that has resulted in collisions, including one bad crash more recently. Placement or lack thereof, of dumpsters, which could attract rodents, and potential increase in noise level with more people in the area were also sited in the feedback letter, Neiwiadomski noted.
The city did not receive any response in favor of the proposed Main Street manufactured home community.
Barbara Williams, a Koby Circle resident, said she appreciates Cody’s vision and what he is trying to do for workers in the city, and tried to keep an open mind. However, Stonebriar does not have a HOA, but instead has deed restrictions, which come with expectations for high quality homes. The realtors she spoke with at Freedom and Janet Martin Realty advised her that lower income housing such as mobile homes, has a negative effect on home values, and did not wish to see it affect her in such a way.
Williams expressed concern for safety coming out of the blind corner, noise traffic as well as potential stray animals a mobile home community would bring to the area. She said perhaps Cody should think through the options a bit more before presenting the proposal for approval, and hoped the Planning and Zoning Commission would hear their concerns and deny a recommendation for a special use permit.
Elise Douglas said she and Ginger Brooks, who was unable to attend the meeting, opposed the proposal. She asked who would finance a 30 year mortgage for a mobile home, and expressed concerns for continuity of owners of the proposed properties, and that they’d become dilapidated.
Her clients include children coming from difficult circumstances and older adults who need the quiet environment they provide. Just last week, she said, a young client ducked under the table when he heard a truck pass by on Main Street. She’s concerned about the potential noise added traffic and 18-30 families would have on those seen at the Main Street office.
Douglas too expressed concern for the traffic situation, citing one severe crash and at least one other recently, which have occurred in that area. They spent part of the morning removing debris left from a crash that had occurred over night from the ditch in front of the Main Street address.
Elise Douglas too cited the lack of either turn lanes or shoulders on the narrow stretch of Main Street and what it might do to property values, especially with taxes going up with increased appraisal values even when the amounts have been protested.
G. Wiedenbeck, who runs 100 MPH Properties, a company that’s invested millions of dollars in Sulphur Springs. He said he is not opposed to mobile homes. In fact, he lived in a 12 x 60 foot mobile home from 2000 to 2004. He has people that work for him who live in some of the mobile home parks in Sulphur Springs. He does not see one being located next to Stonebriar as a positive thing; it would impact the customers they build houses for by affecting their property values; it would also “hurt phase 3” of the planned Stonebriar expansion, so in opposing the proposed community he is looking out for their customers.
Chris Gibbins said his family has lived in the area since 1935 and has tracts around the proposed facility. He said 30-year mortgages are not available to him as a lender, and to insure a mobile home the financial institution must have a statement of location and surrender the title, and wheels left on would be an issue — an ordinance violation. Gravel roads would result in unbelievable dust for the people in Stonebriar edition. Ordinances regarding dumpsters or lack there of could be an issue. His parents live near Galaxy and there are problems. Trash was dumped the previous night on Turtle Creek that they’ll be picking up over the next few days. Trash trucks tear roads up if dumpsters are placed at the back of the property. He recommended that Cody calculate the value of each lot against the cost for a masonry fence, to see the cost effectiveness of the project concept, and consider a different plan for the use of the property.
Jay Webb, whose business is in the process of developing future phases of Stonebriar subdivision, said the business is opposed to having a mobile home park near the Stonebriar due to the negative impact it would have on the community which is planned to add 1,100 or more homes over the next 10 years or so, their investment in it and those in their customers.
Realtor Carrie Nuckolls said she represents Wiedenbeck and Friddle in existing Stonebriar subdivision, where they’ve done 8 homes in the last 18 months and anticipate selling about 8 more in the next 12-18 months. As a realtor, when showing property, potential buyers always say they don’t want to pay for the property if they have to pass by a mobile home or mobile home park daily.
“I think what Mr. Cody has presented is a beautiful vision. I think it’s certainly necessary, but I don’t think it’s necessarily the best use of the property. When we talk about zoning, lots and acre we talk about ‘best use.’ It’s currently zoned commercial. That is not residential or a mobile home park by any means. Everything around it is heavy commercial, ranch land or single family residential.” Nuckolls said.
She said wear and tear on existing utility capacity have been a concern the farther out they are located. Taxes, Nuckolls noted, play a vital role in that.
“If we are talking about use and the best amount of value that property can bring so that the city down the road in 20 or 30 years can support the utilities being used, it is not a cheaper type housing,” Nuckolls. “I we talked about negative impact. I think the impact would be negative. I think the community is necessary. I just don’t think this is the best location.”
She said people coming into town using the old US 67 (Main Street/FM 313) often note how “rough” the area looks compared to the center of town.
Tenny Tanton, speaking on behalf of her parents who live next door to the site Cody proposed constructing the manufactured home community, said her family has lived in the arear for more than 100 years and are proud of the land their family own. She and her siblings will one day inherent the property. She asked the Planning & Zoning Commission to ask themselves whether they’d like to have the proposed park located next to their land or that of their parents or grandparents when making a decision on whether or not to recommend Cody’s request for a special use permit be granted.
“Land owners all the way around are saying no, that this is not what they want in their community. We’ve dealt with the light industry,” Tanton said.
Already people from local businesses come “fly down the road” at shift change, requiring the relocation of her parents’ mailbox. Motorists turning into their driveway have to do so very quickly to avoid being rear-ended, and exiting the drive is the same due to the blind curve. Adding a manufactured home community there will only increase traffic and make it that much more dangerous for the added residents, especially kids who live there.
“We do not need that, young couples with kids, on that road. It is a dangerous road,” Tanton said.
Ross Cody thanked the Planning & Zoning Commission and those in attendance for their time, adding that “it was never my intention to ruin anybody’s property value or diminish anybody’s current estates,” but an attempt to find an option to provide additional affordable housing close to the city.
Ultimately, the Planning & Zoning Commission said, regardless their decision regarding the request, the final decision whether or not to approve or deny the special use permit will be made by the ZBA. While the city staff and P&Z recommendations may be considered, P&Z Commission Chairman Chuck Sickles said the final say would go to the ZBA.
P&Z Commissioner Craig English made a motion, which Twila Gill seconded, and the commission voted unanimously to deny the recommendation for a special use permit.
City staff Tuesday reported the ZBA meeting, which was to consist primarily of the special use permit request, election of ZBA officers and approval of past meeting minutes, has been cancelled and the applicant has withdrawn the request.
